TNC Articles by State

National TNC Articles

Wildlands Project

Message Forum

Guest book

This all sounds just great, but the Forest Service here in Missouri has a MOU with the Nature Conservancy and TNC is already conducting How-to seminars around the country, joined by the Forest Service and of course our good ol' Dept of Agriculture.  My question is: Is the fox guarding the henhouse........?   WB

  Forest measure will touch nation from coast to coast

By Gary Harmon
gharmon@gjds.com
Cox News Service

GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. -- The Healthy Forests Restoration Act signed into law Wednesday by President Bush gives the signal to federal land managers across the country -- from the tinder-dry West to the beetle-infested South -- to prepare treatment plans.

The new law calls on federal land managers to clear 20 million of the nation's 190 million woodland acres deemed to be in most danger of catastrophic wildfires.

The selection process will be a "bottom-up kind of thing" from communities and land managers with the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management, said Mark Rey, undersecretary for natural resources and environment in the Agriculture Department, the administration's most senior forest-policy post.

Project selection can be done "fairly quickly" and in time for summer, when the work would have to be done.

Many of the steps already are outlined in the national fire plan, he said.

Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo said he expected that congressional representatives also would weigh in on behalf of their districts, but that final decisions would remain "with the people on the ground" because politicians and high-level bureaucrats "have been messing this thing up for a long time."

While officials in the West scramble to prepare projects for dry forests, officials in the South can use separate authority in the same measure to attack beetle kill on those lands, Rey said.

The Chattahoochee-Oconee national forests in
Georgia , with patches of beetle kill, would prime candidates for treatment projects under the bill, he said.

Beetle-kill treatments wouldn't count under the bill's 20 million acres for wildfire protection, he said.

The 20 million acres is just a starting point, Rey said, a "target to hit showing we can do a good job and if we succeed in showing Congress that -- we could then go do it on another 20 (million acres)."

A critic of the measure, Udi Lazimy of the American Lands Alliance, said the changes take the public out of the process and "You can't exactly operate from the 'bottom-up' without the public's full involvement. It is, after all, our public land for which we pay taxes to enjoy and preserve."

Treatment priorities will center first on the so-called wildland-urban interface, where forests and communities or homes intermingle. The measure authorizes $760 million a year for thinning projects on the 20 million acres -- a $340 million increase.

Watershed projects would be next in line, said Rep. Scott McInnis, R-Colo., author of the bill, who said significant damage was done to the Denver-area watershed last year by the destructive Hayman fire. It will take years to restore that watershed, which was left looking "like chocolate milk with logs floating in it," he said.

As for the national fire plan, Lazimy said, federal agencies have prioritized treatments with little relation to communities at risk. Fire-plan funding in 2002 resulted in more than 133,000 acres of treatment outside the wildland-urban interface in Colorado , Wyoming , and New Mexico , nearly three times the number of acres treated on federal property adjoining private, state, and tribal lands, he said.

When McInnis first announced his measure, he said it also would include forest-stewardship programs and initiatives for using undergrowth with no commercial value as biomass to generate energy.

The stewardship portion of the bill passed Congress already in a different bill and the administration is already writing stewardship contracts in New Mexico , Rey said.

The biomass portion was written into both the healthy forests and energy bill with the idea that it would be kept in the first bill to emerge from conference committees.

The energy bill was first out of conference, "so we dropped ours" from the forest bill, Rey said. "Little did we know energy wouldn't go and we did. We probably outsmarted ourselves."

McInnis was the driving force to get the bill through, Rey said, and "distinguished himself as a legislator this session in a way the Western Slope hasn't seen since the days of Wayne Aspinall."



Gary Harmon writes for The ( Grand Junction , Colo. ) Daily Sentinel.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted
material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have
expressed  a  prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to:
 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml